Before the IC commits
Commit knowing exactly where the plan is anchored, where it isn’t, and where you haven’t checked.
LPs want transformation, and AI now delivers more substance in the same time. The VCP looks more complete than ever. But the polish verified nothing against the asset. As the plan branches into specifics, the line back to what each claim is based on fades. The commitments live at the tips. The grounding lives at the root. And the line between them fades on the way down.
And AI accelerates both. The plan is now drafted in days from priors and increasingly run by agents. The one step that can’t move at that speed is checking it against this asset. So the plan races ahead of the one verification that matters, and the handoff below carries even less grounding than before.
Understanding of the plan should compound. Each stage building on the last. Instead it resets at every handoff: the next owner rebuilds the reasoning from scratch, sorting what’s executable from what’s still an assumption. Every plan. Every time.
CMC reads your diligence against the plan’s load-bearing points and resolves each one: anchored, unanchored, or untested.
The check can’t come from the same place as the plan. A model can’t audit its own blind spots. CMC derives the checks from the objective, not from the priors that wrote the plan.
Send one closed deal. We map where the plan anchored against the operating model. You check it against what actually happened in the hold. No charge.
5 years of Industrial Engineering applied to automotive, aerospace, software, requirements engineering and AI transformation (Accenture, Porsche Consulting, Lufthansa Technik etc.).